What Abbas and his senior officials apparently fear is that the current wave of anti-corruption protests sweeping Lebanon and other Arab countries may reach the West Bank. They appear nervous that their critics and political rivals will use social media to encourage Palestinians to revolt against corruption and tyranny.
Bassam Tawil..
Gatestone Institute..
30 October '19..
For the past few months, Palestinians have been accusing Facebook of "waging war on Palestinian content" by suspending dozens of accounts belonging to Palestinian activists and groups suspected of anti-Israel incitement and promotion of terrorism. The Palestinians even went as far as accusing the social media giant of being in collusion with Israel to "suppress the Palestinian narrative and conceal the reality of Israeli crimes."
In the context of the campaign, the Palestinians used the hashtag #FBblocksPalestine to "reveal the double-standard policy of Facebook management in dealing with Israeli and Palestinian incitement on its site," according to the Palestinian NGO Sada Social Center.
Earlier this month, Facebook further angered Palestinians when it deleted the page of the Hamas-affiliated Palestinian Information Center. Several Palestinian journalists, political activists and Hamas officials accused Facebook of serving as a "tool of suppression" in the hands of Israel.
The London-based group, ImpACT International for Human Rights Policies, claimed that Israel was exploiting its relations with Facebook to "combat Palestinian content." The group also claimed that the war on Palestinian content was attributed to "economic interests" between Israel and Facebook.
The past week, however, has shown that if anyone is waging war on Palestinian content, it is the Palestinians themselves.
(Continue to Full Post)
Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Monday, October 28, 2019
Agence France Presse Covers Up Gaza Border Infiltration - by Tamar Sternthal
CAMERA calls on AFP to amend the captions to make clear that Shahin was reportedly attempting to cross the border when he was fatally injured.
Tamar Sternthal..
CAMERA..
27 October '19..
Multiple Agence France Presse photo captions last week concealed that Palestinian Imad Shahin was attempting to cross the Gaza Strip border into Israel when Israeli troops fatally shot him. According to the inaccurate APF captions, Imad Shahin, 17, of Gaza “reportedly died of his injuries sustained during a protest on the Gaza border fence last year.” Shahin did not die during a “protest,” but as he reportedly attempted to infiltrate into Israel. According to B’Tselem, an organization highly critical of Israeli actions in the region:
The Palestine News Network acknowledges that Shahin was fatally injured “after he crossed the separation fence east of the central province for a few meters.” On Nov. 4, the Maan News Agency reported:
A sampling of the inaccurate captions follows.
(Continue to Full Post)
Tamar Sternthal..
CAMERA..
27 October '19..
Multiple Agence France Presse photo captions last week concealed that Palestinian Imad Shahin was attempting to cross the Gaza Strip border into Israel when Israeli troops fatally shot him. According to the inaccurate APF captions, Imad Shahin, 17, of Gaza “reportedly died of his injuries sustained during a protest on the Gaza border fence last year.” Shahin did not die during a “protest,” but as he reportedly attempted to infiltrate into Israel. According to B’Tselem, an organization highly critical of Israeli actions in the region:
‘Imad Khalil Ibrahim Shahin
17 years old, resident of a-Nuseirat Camp, Deir al-Balah District, injured on 03 Nov 2018 in al-Maghazi R.C, Deir al-Balah District, by live ammunition, and died on 04 Nov 2018. Did not participate in hostilities. Additional information: Shot and wounded by soldiers when trying to breach the fence with an axe together with two friends, one of whom was also carrying an axe. The other was wounded by shrapnel. Evacuated to a hospital in Israel where he died of his wounds.
The Palestine News Network acknowledges that Shahin was fatally injured “after he crossed the separation fence east of the central province for a few meters.” On Nov. 4, the Maan News Agency reported:
One Palestinian was shot and critically injured, on late Saturday, after he allegedly crossed the security border fence with Israel along the borders of the besieged Gaza Strip.
The Israeli army issued a statement in which it confirmed that a Palestinian was shot and injured after crossing the security border fence with Israel.
A sampling of the inaccurate captions follows.
(Continue to Full Post)
Sunday, October 27, 2019
The Zionist spirit that led our ancestors on the first aliyah dreamt the impossible - by Rabbi Uri Pilichowski
The Zionist spirit that led our ancestors on the first aliyah, that pushed for a state against the British Empire, and didn’t cower in the face of stronger Arab armies in 1948, didn’t think of the practical, they dreamt the impossible. I don’t know the solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or if there even is a solution, but I know compromising on the Zionist dream for a less than ideal two state solution contradicts everything Zionism stands for. We must not accept the possible and forgo the dream. It is time we began implementing the impossible and actualizing our dreams.
Rabbi Uri Pilichowski..
TOI Blog..
27 October '19..
Zionism’s strength was in its creativity and imagination. The founder of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl, famously said, “If you will it, it is no dream.” Zionism aimed to make the impossible – the return of the Jewish people to their land after 2,000 years and establish their own state – possible. For 2,000 years Jews thought and told each other that they’d only be able to return to the land when Messiah brought them back. Zionism told the Jews to actualize their national aspirations. It left no room for inhibition because of practical considerations. The impossible became feasible, and the impractical became reality. Herzl, Ben Gurion and Jabotinsky, Peres, Begin and Rabin didn’t listen to those who said a Jewish state couldn’t happen – they figured out how to make it happen.
Fast forward a hundred years and facing the same obstacle of local Palestinians and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israelis are told they only have two choices. They can either live in a Jewish democratic state by creating a Palestinian state (the two state solution) or keep one state that either loses its Jewish character or maintains apartheid like policies without its democratic character.
Limiting its options to only the two mentioned above contradicts Zionist thought- Zionism, built on the refusal to be limited maintains that there is always a better way. Zionism believes in dreams not limiting itself to practical solutions. What seems like a dream can happen, if only Zionists will it to happen.
The two state solution wasn’t an actual consideration in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict until George W. Bush dangled it in front of the Palestinians as a carrot if they’d rid themselves of Palestinian ruler Yasser Arafat.The Oslo process never aimed to create a Palestinian state. The same peace activists who were the mediators during the Oslo Process and had no problem with the Palestinians only having autonomy over their own cities and not their own state, today decry the future of the Jewish state if Israel doesn’t quickly implement the two state solution. There is no rational reason why in 1993 there was no imperative to create a Palestinian State, but there is an imperative in 2019.
(Continue to Full Post)
Rabbi Uri Pilichowski is an educator. As a teacher, author and speaker, he teaches Torah and Politics, where he specifically emphasizes rational thought and conceptual analysis.
Rabbi Uri Pilichowski..
TOI Blog..
27 October '19..
Zionism’s strength was in its creativity and imagination. The founder of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl, famously said, “If you will it, it is no dream.” Zionism aimed to make the impossible – the return of the Jewish people to their land after 2,000 years and establish their own state – possible. For 2,000 years Jews thought and told each other that they’d only be able to return to the land when Messiah brought them back. Zionism told the Jews to actualize their national aspirations. It left no room for inhibition because of practical considerations. The impossible became feasible, and the impractical became reality. Herzl, Ben Gurion and Jabotinsky, Peres, Begin and Rabin didn’t listen to those who said a Jewish state couldn’t happen – they figured out how to make it happen.
Fast forward a hundred years and facing the same obstacle of local Palestinians and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israelis are told they only have two choices. They can either live in a Jewish democratic state by creating a Palestinian state (the two state solution) or keep one state that either loses its Jewish character or maintains apartheid like policies without its democratic character.
Limiting its options to only the two mentioned above contradicts Zionist thought- Zionism, built on the refusal to be limited maintains that there is always a better way. Zionism believes in dreams not limiting itself to practical solutions. What seems like a dream can happen, if only Zionists will it to happen.
The two state solution wasn’t an actual consideration in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict until George W. Bush dangled it in front of the Palestinians as a carrot if they’d rid themselves of Palestinian ruler Yasser Arafat.The Oslo process never aimed to create a Palestinian state. The same peace activists who were the mediators during the Oslo Process and had no problem with the Palestinians only having autonomy over their own cities and not their own state, today decry the future of the Jewish state if Israel doesn’t quickly implement the two state solution. There is no rational reason why in 1993 there was no imperative to create a Palestinian State, but there is an imperative in 2019.
(Continue to Full Post)
Rabbi Uri Pilichowski is an educator. As a teacher, author and speaker, he teaches Torah and Politics, where he specifically emphasizes rational thought and conceptual analysis.
Friday, October 25, 2019
Sen. Chuck Schumer’s shocking reversal on J Street - by Stephen M. Flatow
Why has Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who has called himself “a guardian of Israel,” agreed to be a featured speaker for perhaps the most effective pro-Palestinian lobbying group in Washington?
Stephen M. Flatow..
JNS.org..
24 October '19..
The decision by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to serve as one of the featured speakers at the upcoming J Street conference should trouble every supporter of Israel. It’s both a boost for the Jewish critics of Israel and a disturbing sign of trends within the Democratic Party.
It was 10 years ago this week, in October 2009, that the New York senator announced that he would not be speaking at that year’s J Street conference in Washington, D.C., following reports that he had initially accepted its invitation to speak.
J Street is probably the most effective pro-Palestinian lobbying group in Washington. There are, of course, many groups operating in the nation’s capital with the word “Palestine” in their name. The secret of J Street’s success is precisely the fact that it does not contain the word.
Still, it uses its Jewish identity to create a veneer of credibility that masks the fact that its agenda is to pressure Israel to give in to Palestinian demands. The groups that openly brandish the “Palestine” label are too obvious; J Street’s more subtle approach is a much more effective way to advance the Palestinian agenda.
No wonder Schumer didn’t want to be associated with J Street. It represented the opposite of what he said he believes. Just a few months later, when he was interviewed on the Nachum Segal radio show in New York City on April 21, 2010, he said: “You have to show Israel that it’s not going to be forced to do things it doesn’t want to do and can’t do. At the same time, you have to show the Palestinians that they are not going to get their way by just sitting back and not giving in, and not recognizing that there is a State of Israel.”
As we all know, politicians spend a lot of time trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing. It’s the nature of their job to constantly worry about where their next votes and donations will be coming from. Back in 2009, Schumer and his staff evidently sized up J Street and decided (correctly) that it was a radical group on the margins of the Jewish community.
(Continue to Full Column)
Stephen M. Flatow..
JNS.org..
24 October '19..
The decision by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to serve as one of the featured speakers at the upcoming J Street conference should trouble every supporter of Israel. It’s both a boost for the Jewish critics of Israel and a disturbing sign of trends within the Democratic Party.
It was 10 years ago this week, in October 2009, that the New York senator announced that he would not be speaking at that year’s J Street conference in Washington, D.C., following reports that he had initially accepted its invitation to speak.
J Street is probably the most effective pro-Palestinian lobbying group in Washington. There are, of course, many groups operating in the nation’s capital with the word “Palestine” in their name. The secret of J Street’s success is precisely the fact that it does not contain the word.
Still, it uses its Jewish identity to create a veneer of credibility that masks the fact that its agenda is to pressure Israel to give in to Palestinian demands. The groups that openly brandish the “Palestine” label are too obvious; J Street’s more subtle approach is a much more effective way to advance the Palestinian agenda.
No wonder Schumer didn’t want to be associated with J Street. It represented the opposite of what he said he believes. Just a few months later, when he was interviewed on the Nachum Segal radio show in New York City on April 21, 2010, he said: “You have to show Israel that it’s not going to be forced to do things it doesn’t want to do and can’t do. At the same time, you have to show the Palestinians that they are not going to get their way by just sitting back and not giving in, and not recognizing that there is a State of Israel.”
As we all know, politicians spend a lot of time trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing. It’s the nature of their job to constantly worry about where their next votes and donations will be coming from. Back in 2009, Schumer and his staff evidently sized up J Street and decided (correctly) that it was a radical group on the margins of the Jewish community.
(Continue to Full Column)
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Wrong, Sen. Warren - creating a Palestinian state is not 'official US policy'. Not even close. - by Stephen M. Flatow
I understand why advocates of the Palestinian cause like to claim that a Palestinian state is longstanding U.S. policy. It makes the idea sound more legitimate. It creates an air of inevitability. But it’s a lie. Somebody needs to explain that to Senator Warren.
Stephen M. Flatow..
Israel National News..
24 October '19..
Link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/24619
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren has raised eyebrows with her not-so-subtle threat to withhold U.S. aid from Israel in order to extract Israeli concessions. But there was another disturbing element to Warren’s statement that is being overlooked.
“It is the official policy of the United States of America to support a two-state solution, and if Israel is moving in the opposite direction, then everything is on the table,” Warren said at an Iowa campaign event this past week, in response to a question about whether she would use aid to pressure Israel.
“Official U.S. policy”? Not even close.
It is not the policy of the Trump administration to support creating a Palestinian Arab state. In fact, administration officials have specifically said that their forthcoming proposal for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement does not include a Palestinian state.
The London Guardian reported on September 5: “Although little is known for certain about the Kushner-Greenblatt plan, Trump officials have made it clear it will not commit to supporting the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel…” Other media outlets have reported likewise.
But it didn’t start with President Trump.
Stephen M. Flatow..
Israel National News..
24 October '19..
Link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/24619
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren has raised eyebrows with her not-so-subtle threat to withhold U.S. aid from Israel in order to extract Israeli concessions. But there was another disturbing element to Warren’s statement that is being overlooked.
“It is the official policy of the United States of America to support a two-state solution, and if Israel is moving in the opposite direction, then everything is on the table,” Warren said at an Iowa campaign event this past week, in response to a question about whether she would use aid to pressure Israel.
“Official U.S. policy”? Not even close.
It is not the policy of the Trump administration to support creating a Palestinian Arab state. In fact, administration officials have specifically said that their forthcoming proposal for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement does not include a Palestinian state.
The London Guardian reported on September 5: “Although little is known for certain about the Kushner-Greenblatt plan, Trump officials have made it clear it will not commit to supporting the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel…” Other media outlets have reported likewise.
But it didn’t start with President Trump.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Actually, Hadassah Hospital Already Showed Us how to Deal with Ahmed Tibi - by Sheri Oz
Hadassah showed no hesitation whatsoever. You break the rules. You suffer the consequences. Why can our elected lawmakers not understand that and make sure Tibi does not get to continue to betray the country that pays his salary and to which he should have pledged allegiance?
Sheri Oz..
Israel Diaries..
23 October '19..
The writing has been on the wall for a long time, yet every time complaints are filed with the police against incitement to violence on the part of Israeli Arab members of the Knesset, the police choose to ignore them. In 2008, Israel National News website published an article about Ahmed Tibi entitled, Tibi – Profile of a Brilliant Enemy, in which a few examples were given, such as this one:
Anyone who has read the section of the law regarding banning MKs from the Knesset can clearly see how Tibi should be banned (with perhaps even greater basis than the banning of Jewish candidates for the Knesset). Here is the relevant section of the law:
Without doubt, Tibi repeatedly violates point 3 above.
(Continue to Full Post)
Sheri Oz..
Israel Diaries..
23 October '19..
The writing has been on the wall for a long time, yet every time complaints are filed with the police against incitement to violence on the part of Israeli Arab members of the Knesset, the police choose to ignore them. In 2008, Israel National News website published an article about Ahmed Tibi entitled, Tibi – Profile of a Brilliant Enemy, in which a few examples were given, such as this one:
On January 11, 2007, Tibi participated in a large gathering marking 42 years since the founding of Fatah, in Ramallah. He called upon Fatah’s terrorists to continue their struggle against Israel, “until all of the Palestinian land is freed.” He accused Israel of murdering Arab babies. “They want to eliminate the Palestinian children, the women and the elderly, en route to the elimination of the ideas of Palestinian freedom and liberty,” he told the crowd.
Anyone who has read the section of the law regarding banning MKs from the Knesset can clearly see how Tibi should be banned (with perhaps even greater basis than the banning of Jewish candidates for the Knesset). Here is the relevant section of the law:
A candidates’ list shall not participate in elections to the Knesset, and a person shall not be a candidate for election to the Knesset, if the objects or actions of the list or the actions of the person, expressly or by implication, include one of the following:
1. negation of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state;
2. incitement to racism;
3. support of armed struggle, by a hostile state or a terrorist organization, against the State of Israel.
Without doubt, Tibi repeatedly violates point 3 above.
(Continue to Full Post)
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Surprise! Arab-on-Arab murders in Israel soar? Israel’s to blame, of course. - by Ken Cohen
It seems that no pathology in the Arab world arises without Israel actions—or inaction—being the cause.
Ken Cohen..
FLAME/JNS.org..
22 October '19..
The murder rate in Israeli Arab communities has soared, and most of the responsibility for this dismal fact is assigned by media outlets to the State of Israel and its police. Among those piling on are the “usual suspects”: The Washington Post, The New York Times and other worldwide media.
Citing, in its headline, Israel’s “double standard in policing,” The Washington Post reported that a young Arab man named Ibrahim Mahamid, whose family was embroiled in a feud with another group, was shot twice in the back from a speeding Mazda 5 in the large Israeli Arab town of Umm al-Fahm. Mahamid was just one of the 15 Israeli Arabs murdered in the past month. Negligent Israeli policing was blamed for the tragedy.
It seems that no pathology in the Arab world arises without Israel actions—or inaction—being the cause. Rioters in Gaza try to break through the border to terrorize Israelis? Clearly, Israel’s defensive blockade of Gaza is at fault. A pre-planned, bloody intifada erupts in 2000? Simply the result of an Israeli politician “defiling” the sacred mosque atop the Temple Mount. Israeli buses, pizza joints and discos get blown up, and the press focuses on the evil predations of Israel’s “occupation” or “settlements.”
In this latest spate of violence, Arab gangs in Israeli cities murder each other, Israeli Arab thugs murder Israeli Arab passersby, Israeli Arab tribal groups and clans serially murder one another, Israeli Arab gun and drug deals turn lethal, young Israeli Arab women are murdered by their own families in “honor killings,” and—you guessed it—Israel’s government and police are to blame.
(Continue to Full Column)
Ken Cohen is editor of Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME), which publishes educational messages to correct lies and misperceptions about Israel and its relationship to the United States.
Ken Cohen..
FLAME/JNS.org..
22 October '19..
The murder rate in Israeli Arab communities has soared, and most of the responsibility for this dismal fact is assigned by media outlets to the State of Israel and its police. Among those piling on are the “usual suspects”: The Washington Post, The New York Times and other worldwide media.
Citing, in its headline, Israel’s “double standard in policing,” The Washington Post reported that a young Arab man named Ibrahim Mahamid, whose family was embroiled in a feud with another group, was shot twice in the back from a speeding Mazda 5 in the large Israeli Arab town of Umm al-Fahm. Mahamid was just one of the 15 Israeli Arabs murdered in the past month. Negligent Israeli policing was blamed for the tragedy.
It seems that no pathology in the Arab world arises without Israel actions—or inaction—being the cause. Rioters in Gaza try to break through the border to terrorize Israelis? Clearly, Israel’s defensive blockade of Gaza is at fault. A pre-planned, bloody intifada erupts in 2000? Simply the result of an Israeli politician “defiling” the sacred mosque atop the Temple Mount. Israeli buses, pizza joints and discos get blown up, and the press focuses on the evil predations of Israel’s “occupation” or “settlements.”
In this latest spate of violence, Arab gangs in Israeli cities murder each other, Israeli Arab thugs murder Israeli Arab passersby, Israeli Arab tribal groups and clans serially murder one another, Israeli Arab gun and drug deals turn lethal, young Israeli Arab women are murdered by their own families in “honor killings,” and—you guessed it—Israel’s government and police are to blame.
(Continue to Full Column)
Ken Cohen is editor of Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME), which publishes educational messages to correct lies and misperceptions about Israel and its relationship to the United States.
Sunday, October 20, 2019
House Speaker Pelosi, please rectify this travesty of justice - by Frimet Roth
Instead of flattering him, Ms. Pelosi, use your clout to insist he abide by the extradition treaty his father signed and ratified in 1995. Tamimi has evaded the rule of law for long enough. You, as a lawmaker, can rectify this travesty of justice.
Frimet Roth..
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly..
20 October '19..
Our heartache deepened as yet another US Congressional delegation flew to Amman, Jordan, this weekend to meet with and praise the terror-abetting King Abdullah II ["19-Oct-19: House Speaker Pelosi led an official visit today to the chief protector of our child's killer"]
Notwithstanding the demands of the impeachment inquiries, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi found the time to present the Jordanian dictator with the same adulation she lavished on him in March 2019 and then again in April 2019 in Washington DC.
US leaders on both sides of the aisle persist in ignoring the fact that the object of their friendship steadfastly rejects the US Department of Justice's demand for the extradition of mass murderer, Ahlam Tamimi.
(Continue to Full Post)
Frimet Roth..
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly..
20 October '19..
Our heartache deepened as yet another US Congressional delegation flew to Amman, Jordan, this weekend to meet with and praise the terror-abetting King Abdullah II ["19-Oct-19: House Speaker Pelosi led an official visit today to the chief protector of our child's killer"]
Notwithstanding the demands of the impeachment inquiries, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi found the time to present the Jordanian dictator with the same adulation she lavished on him in March 2019 and then again in April 2019 in Washington DC.
US leaders on both sides of the aisle persist in ignoring the fact that the object of their friendship steadfastly rejects the US Department of Justice's demand for the extradition of mass murderer, Ahlam Tamimi.
(Continue to Full Post)
Friday, October 18, 2019
Past time to put a stop to indoctrinating schoolchildren into anti-Israel falsehoods - by Melanie Phillips
This poisonous tide will only begin to be turned if those who think themselves to be custodians of the center-ground realize the extent to which they too have drunk the Middle Eastern Kool-Aid.
Melanie Phillips..
JNS.org..
17 October '19..
Concern about resurgent anti-Semitism has been at fever-pitch among Diaspora Jews for years.
In Britain, the veteran Jewish Labour MP Dame Louise Ellman resigned this week from the party to which she has belonged for more than half a century.
A leaked Labour headquarters report on her Liverpool Wavertree constituency party showed that in 2017, there was a “worrying amount of anti-Semitism” and a “toxic atmosphere” with members fearing for their physical safety.
If the far-left party leader Jeremy Corbyn became prime minister, says Ellman, he would be a danger to both the Jewish community and the country.
Labour’s Jew-baiting and Israel-bashing have become mainstream in the party. This is blamed largely on Corbyn’s open hostility to Israel, his support for Palestinian terrorists and his refusal to acknowledge the scale of his party’s bigotry against Israel and the Jewish people.
In America, a similar phenomenon surfaced with “The Squad” of four Democratic congresswomen who are also virulently hostile towards Israel, two of whom have made prejudiced remarks about Jews.
These views are generally ascribed to the far-left, with more than a dash of Muslim anti-Jewish attitudes fermenting the mix to reach toxic levels. Beyond the political class, they are associated principally with higher education.
On both sides of the pond, anxious Jews have been agonizing for years over how to combat the appalling levels of anti-Israel, anti-Jewish discourse on university campuses with their “Israel apartheid” weeks, harassment of Jewish students and the platforms they provide for virulent Israel-bashers while depriving Israel supporters of a platform.
All this is bad enough. Yet in both Britain and America, what’s been largely overlooked is the even more devastating indoctrination of schoolchildren into these murderous falsehoods.
(Continue to Full Column)
Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for “The Times of London,” her personal and political memoir, “Guardian Angel,” has been published by Bombardier, which also published her first novel, “The Legacy,” in 2018. Her work can be found at: www.melaniephillips.com
Melanie Phillips..
JNS.org..
17 October '19..
Concern about resurgent anti-Semitism has been at fever-pitch among Diaspora Jews for years.
In Britain, the veteran Jewish Labour MP Dame Louise Ellman resigned this week from the party to which she has belonged for more than half a century.
A leaked Labour headquarters report on her Liverpool Wavertree constituency party showed that in 2017, there was a “worrying amount of anti-Semitism” and a “toxic atmosphere” with members fearing for their physical safety.
If the far-left party leader Jeremy Corbyn became prime minister, says Ellman, he would be a danger to both the Jewish community and the country.
Labour’s Jew-baiting and Israel-bashing have become mainstream in the party. This is blamed largely on Corbyn’s open hostility to Israel, his support for Palestinian terrorists and his refusal to acknowledge the scale of his party’s bigotry against Israel and the Jewish people.
In America, a similar phenomenon surfaced with “The Squad” of four Democratic congresswomen who are also virulently hostile towards Israel, two of whom have made prejudiced remarks about Jews.
These views are generally ascribed to the far-left, with more than a dash of Muslim anti-Jewish attitudes fermenting the mix to reach toxic levels. Beyond the political class, they are associated principally with higher education.
On both sides of the pond, anxious Jews have been agonizing for years over how to combat the appalling levels of anti-Israel, anti-Jewish discourse on university campuses with their “Israel apartheid” weeks, harassment of Jewish students and the platforms they provide for virulent Israel-bashers while depriving Israel supporters of a platform.
All this is bad enough. Yet in both Britain and America, what’s been largely overlooked is the even more devastating indoctrination of schoolchildren into these murderous falsehoods.
(Continue to Full Column)
Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for “The Times of London,” her personal and political memoir, “Guardian Angel,” has been published by Bombardier, which also published her first novel, “The Legacy,” in 2018. Her work can be found at: www.melaniephillips.com
Thursday, October 17, 2019
The impossibility of separating anti-Zionist agitation from Jew-hatred - by Jonathan S. Tobin
A “Forward” editor learns that those who seek to delegitimize Israel and its supporters are more than willing to tolerate anti-Semitism.
Jonathan S. Tobin..
JNS.org..
16 October '19..
Forward opinion editor Batya Ungar-Sargon got a shock last week when she discovered while taking part in a conference at Bard College that it is impossible to separate the discussion of anti-Semitism from one that focuses on Israel and Zionism. But while her experience was surprising on one level, it really should have been a given.
Ungar-Sargon was asked to speak at the conference hosted by Bard’s Hannah Arendt Center, where she was to be part of a discussion on “Racism and Zionism: Black-Jewish Relations.” Prior to that, she was slated to take part in another panel that was to discuss anti-Semitism along with Harvard University scholar Ruth Wisse and a Holocaust survivor. Students for Justice for Palestine, a group that actively promotes the BDS movement and which engages in anti-Semitic incitement, planned to protest at the conference. But what threw Ungar-Sargon for a loop was that these opponents of Israel weren’t going to be satisfied with protesting at the session about Zionism but would first seek to disrupt the one about anti-Semitism.
That session was the only one at the conference where the entire panel would be composed of Jews—and it was also the one that Israel haters planned to target. But what really shocked Ungar-Sargon was that members of the Bard faculty, as well as some of the other scholars and writers participating in the conference, supported this effort to challenge the presentation on anti-Semitism.
Not unreasonably, Ungar-Sargon understood this effort essentially to silence a discussion about Jew-hatred and to single out three Jewish speakers for opprobrium as itself an act of anti-Semitism.
But the conference organizers, along with many of the intellectuals present for the show, disagreed. As far as they were concerned, any talk about anti-Semitism was fair game for being hooted down because part of that discussion would inevitably focus on how Israel and its supporters are targeted in ways that are indistinguishable from classic hatred aimed at Jews. As Ungar-Sargon tried to point out, protesting Jews because of anger about Israel even when they are speaking about Zionism is inherently anti-Semitic. As she later wrote: “Right-wing anti-Semites see any accusation of anti-Semitism as a Jewish conspiracy to take away the rights of whites, while left-wing anti-Semites sees the same accusation as an attempt to silence Palestinians.” The mere raising of the issue is unacceptable since it makes those who hate Israel feel “unsafe.”
(Continue to Full Column)
Jonathan S. Tobin..
JNS.org..
16 October '19..
Forward opinion editor Batya Ungar-Sargon got a shock last week when she discovered while taking part in a conference at Bard College that it is impossible to separate the discussion of anti-Semitism from one that focuses on Israel and Zionism. But while her experience was surprising on one level, it really should have been a given.
Ungar-Sargon was asked to speak at the conference hosted by Bard’s Hannah Arendt Center, where she was to be part of a discussion on “Racism and Zionism: Black-Jewish Relations.” Prior to that, she was slated to take part in another panel that was to discuss anti-Semitism along with Harvard University scholar Ruth Wisse and a Holocaust survivor. Students for Justice for Palestine, a group that actively promotes the BDS movement and which engages in anti-Semitic incitement, planned to protest at the conference. But what threw Ungar-Sargon for a loop was that these opponents of Israel weren’t going to be satisfied with protesting at the session about Zionism but would first seek to disrupt the one about anti-Semitism.
That session was the only one at the conference where the entire panel would be composed of Jews—and it was also the one that Israel haters planned to target. But what really shocked Ungar-Sargon was that members of the Bard faculty, as well as some of the other scholars and writers participating in the conference, supported this effort to challenge the presentation on anti-Semitism.
Not unreasonably, Ungar-Sargon understood this effort essentially to silence a discussion about Jew-hatred and to single out three Jewish speakers for opprobrium as itself an act of anti-Semitism.
But the conference organizers, along with many of the intellectuals present for the show, disagreed. As far as they were concerned, any talk about anti-Semitism was fair game for being hooted down because part of that discussion would inevitably focus on how Israel and its supporters are targeted in ways that are indistinguishable from classic hatred aimed at Jews. As Ungar-Sargon tried to point out, protesting Jews because of anger about Israel even when they are speaking about Zionism is inherently anti-Semitic. As she later wrote: “Right-wing anti-Semites see any accusation of anti-Semitism as a Jewish conspiracy to take away the rights of whites, while left-wing anti-Semites sees the same accusation as an attempt to silence Palestinians.” The mere raising of the issue is unacceptable since it makes those who hate Israel feel “unsafe.”
(Continue to Full Column)
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
Trump, CNN, the Kurds, Normandy - and Israel? - by Alex Safian PHD
...So while the Jews of the Palestine Mandate (later Israel) fought on the British side, the leader of the Palestinians, Haj Amin al-Husseini, did everything in his power to help the Nazis defeat the Allies, and to murder the Jews. Perhaps Brooke Baldwin and her colleagues at CNN might want to consider tweeting about that — and covering it.
Alex Safian PHD..
CAMERA..
14 October '19..
After President Trump announced his controversial decision to pull some US troops from Northern Syria near the Turkish border, opening the way for a Turkish offensive against Kurds who had been allied with the US, the president attempted to explain his policy by noting that the Kurds are:
The president was apparently referring to a column by writer and US Army veteran Kurt Schlichter, which in its relevant section said:
So the president wasn’t just referring to Normandy, he was following Schlichter in citing a number of notable US battles in World War II, the Korean and Viet Nam wars, and the post-911 battles against the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.
Which brings us to CNN – covering the controversy, anchor Brooke Baldwin approvingly quoted a CNN contributor’s tweet:
BALDWIN: Before we talk about what President Trump said last night, there was a tweet that caught my eye this morning from one of our standing contributors, Wajahat Ali. And I just wanted to read it for you. He said, here are the countries that did not fight with the U.S. at Normandy whose leaders Trump nonetheless helps or praises, Saudi Arabia, Russia, North Korea, Israel, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt, Hungary. But he decides to single out the Kurds.
There are two notable things about the tweet that Baldwin approvingly cites:
1. The president didn’t just refer to Normandy, so harping on who fought at Normandy is a distraction from the larger point the president was making, whether one feels it is a valid point or not.
2. Why bring in Israel?
Some who have criticized President Trump’s rationale pointed out that in fairness to the Kurds, they don’t have a state now and didn’t have one during World War II either, so it would have been impossible for them to fight at Normandy or in the other cited battles as if there had been a country of Kurdistan.
Of course, Israel also didn’t have a state, and so organized Jewish forces didn’t fight at Normandy either. But what Baldwin and most of her viewers don’t know is that organized Jewish forces did fight in World War II, on the side of the Allies. Under the British-ruled Palestine Mandate (which ended in 1948), some 30,000 Jewish volunteers from the territory fought with British forces during the war, and in 1944 the British finally agreed to form a Jewish Brigade of some 5000 soldiers, which fought alongside British forces in Europe, and therefore also alongside United States forces.
While the British also attempted to enlist Arabs from the Palestine Mandate to serve the war effort, in the end very few did.
Perhaps this is because the founder and first leader of the Palestinian national movement, Haj Amin al-Husseini, known as the Grand Mufti, was an ally of Nazi Germany almost from the inception of Nazi rule, and fled to Berlin at the outbreak of World War II, where he closely collaborated with the Nazi leadership. Among the Mufti’s notable achievements during his Nazi years was his creation of a special Muslim Waffen SS Division in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Known as the Handschar Division, it committed brutal war crimes against Serbian Christians and Jews, leading the postwar Yugoslavian government to indict the Mufti as a war criminal.
(Continue to Full Post)
Alex Safian PHD..
CAMERA..
14 October '19..
After President Trump announced his controversial decision to pull some US troops from Northern Syria near the Turkish border, opening the way for a Turkish offensive against Kurds who had been allied with the US, the president attempted to explain his policy by noting that the Kurds are:
… fighting for their land, and as somebody wrote in a very, very powerful article today, they didn’t help us in the Second World War, they didn’t help us with Normandy, as an example, they mentioned names of different battles …
The president was apparently referring to a column by writer and US Army veteran Kurt Schlichter, which in its relevant section said:
Let’s be honest – the Kurds didn’t show up for us at Normandy or Inchon or Khe Sanh or Kandahar.
So the president wasn’t just referring to Normandy, he was following Schlichter in citing a number of notable US battles in World War II, the Korean and Viet Nam wars, and the post-911 battles against the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.
Which brings us to CNN – covering the controversy, anchor Brooke Baldwin approvingly quoted a CNN contributor’s tweet:
BALDWIN: Before we talk about what President Trump said last night, there was a tweet that caught my eye this morning from one of our standing contributors, Wajahat Ali. And I just wanted to read it for you. He said, here are the countries that did not fight with the U.S. at Normandy whose leaders Trump nonetheless helps or praises, Saudi Arabia, Russia, North Korea, Israel, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt, Hungary. But he decides to single out the Kurds.
There are two notable things about the tweet that Baldwin approvingly cites:
1. The president didn’t just refer to Normandy, so harping on who fought at Normandy is a distraction from the larger point the president was making, whether one feels it is a valid point or not.
2. Why bring in Israel?
Some who have criticized President Trump’s rationale pointed out that in fairness to the Kurds, they don’t have a state now and didn’t have one during World War II either, so it would have been impossible for them to fight at Normandy or in the other cited battles as if there had been a country of Kurdistan.
Of course, Israel also didn’t have a state, and so organized Jewish forces didn’t fight at Normandy either. But what Baldwin and most of her viewers don’t know is that organized Jewish forces did fight in World War II, on the side of the Allies. Under the British-ruled Palestine Mandate (which ended in 1948), some 30,000 Jewish volunteers from the territory fought with British forces during the war, and in 1944 the British finally agreed to form a Jewish Brigade of some 5000 soldiers, which fought alongside British forces in Europe, and therefore also alongside United States forces.
While the British also attempted to enlist Arabs from the Palestine Mandate to serve the war effort, in the end very few did.
Perhaps this is because the founder and first leader of the Palestinian national movement, Haj Amin al-Husseini, known as the Grand Mufti, was an ally of Nazi Germany almost from the inception of Nazi rule, and fled to Berlin at the outbreak of World War II, where he closely collaborated with the Nazi leadership. Among the Mufti’s notable achievements during his Nazi years was his creation of a special Muslim Waffen SS Division in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Known as the Handschar Division, it committed brutal war crimes against Serbian Christians and Jews, leading the postwar Yugoslavian government to indict the Mufti as a war criminal.
(Continue to Full Post)
Sunday, October 13, 2019
If only Israel would make more concessions... by Martin Sherman
Despite decades of proven failure, Israel’s doves cling to their fatally flawed dogma, insisting if only Israel would make more concessions, a new epoch of Judeo-Arab peace and prosperity would dawn.
Martin Sherman..
JNS.org..
11 October '19..
“The most righteous of men cannot live in peace if his evil neighbor will not let him be.” — From Wilhelm Tell Act IV, scene III, by Friedrich von Schiller, 1804
“It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism, while the wolf remains of a different opinion.” — R. Inge, Dean of St. Paul’s Cathedral, 1915
“He who comes to kill you, rise up early and kill him first.” — The Talmud
The Oslo process that resulted in the signature of the “Declaration of Principles” on the White House Lawns on Sept. 13, 1993 was in many ways a point of singularity in the history of Zionism, after which everything was qualitatively different from that which it was before. It was a point of inflection in the timeline of the evolution of Jewish political independence, during which once-vaunted values became vilified vices.
Thus, almost at a stroke, Jewish settlement and attachment to land—once the essence of the Zionist ethos—were branded as the epitome of egregious extremism. Jewish military might, once exalted as a symbol of national resurgence and self-reliance, was excoriated as the instrument of repression and subjugation.
This metamorphosis is decidedly perplexing. After all, even by the early 1990s, Zionism had proved to be one of the most successful—arguably, the most successful—movement of national liberation that arose from the dissolution of the great Empires, providing political independence, economic prosperity and personal liberties to a degree unrivaled by other such movements.
Moreover, despite the manifest justice on which it was founded, Zionism was always territorial and only prevailed, progressed and prospered because it was reinforced by force of arms. Without either of these two components—the land and the sword—it would be no more than a historical footnote today.
The staggering metamorphosis that took place in the Israeli leadership’s approach was aptly described by Daniel Pipes, who almost two decades ago wrote: “The policy of deterrence dominated Israeli thinking during the country’s first 45 years, 1948-93, and it worked well. … Eventually, Israelis became impatient for a quicker and more active approach. … That impatience brought on the Oslo accords in 1993, in which Israelis initiated more creative and active steps to end the conflict. So totally did deterrence disappear from the Israeli vocabulary, it is today not even considered when policy options are discussed.”
‘Historians will be baffled … ’
Presciently, he summed up the consequences of this ill-advised change:
(Continue to Full Column)
Martin Sherman is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.
Martin Sherman..
JNS.org..
11 October '19..
“The most righteous of men cannot live in peace if his evil neighbor will not let him be.” — From Wilhelm Tell Act IV, scene III, by Friedrich von Schiller, 1804
“It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism, while the wolf remains of a different opinion.” — R. Inge, Dean of St. Paul’s Cathedral, 1915
“He who comes to kill you, rise up early and kill him first.” — The Talmud
The Oslo process that resulted in the signature of the “Declaration of Principles” on the White House Lawns on Sept. 13, 1993 was in many ways a point of singularity in the history of Zionism, after which everything was qualitatively different from that which it was before. It was a point of inflection in the timeline of the evolution of Jewish political independence, during which once-vaunted values became vilified vices.
Thus, almost at a stroke, Jewish settlement and attachment to land—once the essence of the Zionist ethos—were branded as the epitome of egregious extremism. Jewish military might, once exalted as a symbol of national resurgence and self-reliance, was excoriated as the instrument of repression and subjugation.
This metamorphosis is decidedly perplexing. After all, even by the early 1990s, Zionism had proved to be one of the most successful—arguably, the most successful—movement of national liberation that arose from the dissolution of the great Empires, providing political independence, economic prosperity and personal liberties to a degree unrivaled by other such movements.
Moreover, despite the manifest justice on which it was founded, Zionism was always territorial and only prevailed, progressed and prospered because it was reinforced by force of arms. Without either of these two components—the land and the sword—it would be no more than a historical footnote today.
The staggering metamorphosis that took place in the Israeli leadership’s approach was aptly described by Daniel Pipes, who almost two decades ago wrote: “The policy of deterrence dominated Israeli thinking during the country’s first 45 years, 1948-93, and it worked well. … Eventually, Israelis became impatient for a quicker and more active approach. … That impatience brought on the Oslo accords in 1993, in which Israelis initiated more creative and active steps to end the conflict. So totally did deterrence disappear from the Israeli vocabulary, it is today not even considered when policy options are discussed.”
‘Historians will be baffled … ’
Presciently, he summed up the consequences of this ill-advised change:
(Continue to Full Column)
Martin Sherman is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.
Friday, October 11, 2019
Annexation, phony arguments and demographic scare tactics? Where else, but the NY Times - by Stephen M Flatow
Israeli journalist Micah Goodman’s plan to “shrink the conflict” turns out to be just another plan to shrink Israel. There is no shortage of those plans around.
Stephen M. Flatow..
JNS.org..
10 October '19..
What would a Jewish holiday be, without an op-ed in The New York Times demanding that Israel make more concessions to the Palestinian Arabs?
On Rosh Hashanah, the Times published “Shrinking the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” by the Israeli journalist Micah Goodman. In it, he called for five new concessions by Israel: “paving a network of roads connecting all the Palestinian autonomous areas”; turning over control of the roads to the Palestinian Authority; “eliminating Israeli checkpoints”; giving the P.A. “more land for development”; and providing “support [for] the construction of new Palestinian towns.”
If acted upon, these steps would go a long way towards turning the current P.A. autonomy regime into a de facto state. Since that state would obviously include Tulkarm and Qalqilyah, which are on the western edge of the P.A. areas, it means Israel will be just nine miles wide at its mid-section. That’s not even as wide as Washington, D.C. Or the Bronx.
What would Israel receive in exchange for making such risky concessions? Nothing, apparently. Goodman does not make a single demand for any action by the P.A.
(Continue to Full Column)
Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. He is the author of “A Father’s Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror.”
Stephen M. Flatow..
JNS.org..
10 October '19..
What would a Jewish holiday be, without an op-ed in The New York Times demanding that Israel make more concessions to the Palestinian Arabs?
On Rosh Hashanah, the Times published “Shrinking the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” by the Israeli journalist Micah Goodman. In it, he called for five new concessions by Israel: “paving a network of roads connecting all the Palestinian autonomous areas”; turning over control of the roads to the Palestinian Authority; “eliminating Israeli checkpoints”; giving the P.A. “more land for development”; and providing “support [for] the construction of new Palestinian towns.”
If acted upon, these steps would go a long way towards turning the current P.A. autonomy regime into a de facto state. Since that state would obviously include Tulkarm and Qalqilyah, which are on the western edge of the P.A. areas, it means Israel will be just nine miles wide at its mid-section. That’s not even as wide as Washington, D.C. Or the Bronx.
What would Israel receive in exchange for making such risky concessions? Nothing, apparently. Goodman does not make a single demand for any action by the P.A.
(Continue to Full Column)
Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. He is the author of “A Father’s Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror.”
Thursday, October 10, 2019
A Lesson for Israel and the Kurdish People: The World Shrugs at the Weak - by Judith Bergman
The international community abandons the weak – those who rely on others for survival – without so much as an afterthought and leaves them, quite literally, to die. A lesson we know all too well.
Judith Bergman..
MiDA..
Originally Posted at LOTL 16 April '18..
Link: http://en.mida.org.il/2018/04/16/world-shrugs-weak/
The angry clamoring of the UN, the EU and other international actors over Israel’s actions and policies since the Jewish nation state reappeared on the stage in 1948 has grown increasingly obsessive, approximating a kind of mass hysteria, over the years. This fixation on Israeli actions is especially noteworthy in the context of deadly conflicts playing out all around Israel’s borders.
The international actors who like to think that they are the moral conscience of the international community have mustered little more than a shrug in the direction of the horrors that have played out in Syria, for example, over the last seven years.
Those same actors have barely blinked over the torture, rape, and mass murder of Syrians and Iraqis – Yezidi, Kurd, Christian and Muslim. Most recently, this international community has shown its moral stature by largely ignoring the Turkish military onslaught on Afrin, the Kurdish enclave in the north of Syria.
The lesson – clear to even the most amateurish historian – is that the world at large accepts only one currency: Strength.
The international community abandons the weak – those who rely on others for survival – without so much as an afterthought and leaves them, quite literally, to die. Israel learned that lesson a long time ago, when the international community collectively closed its eyes to the brutal murder of six million Jews.
In the case of Israel, the international community, the majority of the mainstream media and the left’s many political and cultural organizations, all claim to be fighting for the sake of ‘peace’, even if such a concept barely translates into anything meaningful in the region.
Muslims have been killing each other, as well as non-Muslims, along sectarian lines for centuries. The entire Middle East is crisscrossed with the remains of the blood baths of internecine Muslim on Muslim war. And still the false, almost insane, idea that people who fight to death among themselves will accept the presence of a universally hated enemy – the Jews – in their midst is marketed not only as a slightly crazy, optimistic idea, but as an imperative that Israel must accept. Israel took the bait in 1993 – Oslo – and has been paying the price in blood ever since.
Judith Bergman..
MiDA..
Originally Posted at LOTL 16 April '18..
Link: http://en.mida.org.il/2018/04/16/world-shrugs-weak/
The angry clamoring of the UN, the EU and other international actors over Israel’s actions and policies since the Jewish nation state reappeared on the stage in 1948 has grown increasingly obsessive, approximating a kind of mass hysteria, over the years. This fixation on Israeli actions is especially noteworthy in the context of deadly conflicts playing out all around Israel’s borders.
The international actors who like to think that they are the moral conscience of the international community have mustered little more than a shrug in the direction of the horrors that have played out in Syria, for example, over the last seven years.
Those same actors have barely blinked over the torture, rape, and mass murder of Syrians and Iraqis – Yezidi, Kurd, Christian and Muslim. Most recently, this international community has shown its moral stature by largely ignoring the Turkish military onslaught on Afrin, the Kurdish enclave in the north of Syria.
The lesson – clear to even the most amateurish historian – is that the world at large accepts only one currency: Strength.
The international community abandons the weak – those who rely on others for survival – without so much as an afterthought and leaves them, quite literally, to die. Israel learned that lesson a long time ago, when the international community collectively closed its eyes to the brutal murder of six million Jews.
In the case of Israel, the international community, the majority of the mainstream media and the left’s many political and cultural organizations, all claim to be fighting for the sake of ‘peace’, even if such a concept barely translates into anything meaningful in the region.
Muslims have been killing each other, as well as non-Muslims, along sectarian lines for centuries. The entire Middle East is crisscrossed with the remains of the blood baths of internecine Muslim on Muslim war. And still the false, almost insane, idea that people who fight to death among themselves will accept the presence of a universally hated enemy – the Jews – in their midst is marketed not only as a slightly crazy, optimistic idea, but as an imperative that Israel must accept. Israel took the bait in 1993 – Oslo – and has been paying the price in blood ever since.
Tuesday, October 8, 2019
How hard is it to produce 12 year old knife-attackers? - by Arnold Roth
...These are not points that the chorus of child-weaponizers and their foreign-government-funders, backers and advocates want us to know. Nor do they advertise the single most important take-away we can think of: that, given Pal Arab society's massive ongoing investment, it is dead easy to weaponize pre-teen Palestinian Arab boys and girls and turn them into killers.
Arnold/Frimet Roth..
This Ongoing War..
07 October '19..
With a current news item in mind, here's some insight into how the Palestinian Authority's policy of child weaponization works.
We wrote here a week and a half ago ["27-Sep-19: Weaponized Palestinian Arab children and more Arab-on-Israel stabbings"] about an on-duty female member of the Israel Police being injured in the course of a frenzied stabbing attack launched by a Palestinian Arab boy of thirteen. We were wrong: he was twelve. And it's evident he didn't intend to inflict mild trauma. He was very likely intent on killing.
The boy apppeared in court yesterday.
There's no indication whether the Waqf worker who tried to prevent the police from taking the stabber into custody will face criminal or terror charges. If he's not, that's disturbing.
Here's some of the background that put the boy in the photo above into, first, an Israeli hospital bed and then Israel's juvenile criminal justice system where he's now fated to spend some of what should have been his best years.
(Continue to Full Post)
Arnold/Frimet Roth..
This Ongoing War..
07 October '19..
With a current news item in mind, here's some insight into how the Palestinian Authority's policy of child weaponization works.
We wrote here a week and a half ago ["27-Sep-19: Weaponized Palestinian Arab children and more Arab-on-Israel stabbings"] about an on-duty female member of the Israel Police being injured in the course of a frenzied stabbing attack launched by a Palestinian Arab boy of thirteen. We were wrong: he was twelve. And it's evident he didn't intend to inflict mild trauma. He was very likely intent on killing.
The boy apppeared in court yesterday.
12-year-old indicted for Jerusalem attack in which officer was lightly injured | Boy charged with terror offenses for attempting to stab police officers in Old City last month; female officer was lightly hurt when barrier fell on her hand during scuffle | Times of Israel | 6 October 2019 | The Jerusalem district attorney on Sunday indicted a 12-year-old boy under terror laws for the attempted stabbing of a policewoman in Jerusalem’s Old City last month.According to the indictment, on September 26, the day of the attack, the minor attended prayers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount. At the conclusion of prayers, he allegedly walked up to a group of female officers at the Temple Mount’s Chain Gate, above the Western Wall area, pulled out a knife and attempted to stab the officers. During the ensuing scuffle, a female officer, age 34, was lightly injured when a security barrier fell on her hand. According to the indictment, a staff member of the Waqf, the Muslim trust that oversees the site, tried to catch the boy and keep the police from him.The boy was overpowered at the scene and arrested.The boy is accused of committing an act of terror in which he unlawfully attempted to injure a person with a knife for religious and national motive. Prosecutors asked that the boy remain detained until the end of legal proceedings.
There's no indication whether the Waqf worker who tried to prevent the police from taking the stabber into custody will face criminal or terror charges. If he's not, that's disturbing.
Here's some of the background that put the boy in the photo above into, first, an Israeli hospital bed and then Israel's juvenile criminal justice system where he's now fated to spend some of what should have been his best years.
(Continue to Full Post)
Monday, October 7, 2019
Isms and the BBC's take on 'Zioinism' - by Roza I.M. El-Eini
Indeed, Shindler’s presentation on Zionism is so desiccated, so unsympathetic and ridiculing of the Jewish plight and of the Jews’ desperate desire for national self-determination, for Am Israel Chai, that, by any standards, it is unworthy of critique. However, since Shindler prepared this for no less a public organization than the BBC, with its vast and sprawling network across the internet and the world, and proudly puts it on his own website, it has to be scrutinized for what it is and a record of this scrutiny is here made.
Roza I.M. El-Eini..
JPost/Opinion..
05 October '19..
On its website, the BBC has an animated series entitled An A-Z of -isms – including one episode titled “Zionism: A Very Brief History” – and gives this strapline: “Writers, academics and thinkers share their takes on some of the world’s most important ideas (plus a few fun ones).”
The corporation declares that it is “the world’s leading public service broadcaster,” and creates “distinctive, world-class programmes and content which inform, educate and entertain millions of people in the UK and around the world.” Therefore, although, so far, only 79,300 or so of those millions have clicked the Zionism animation, it must be remembered that it is on the BBC’s website and not on some obscure ranter’s internet outlet.
As it is, for now, one of the most viewed -isms, it cannot be ignored and remains relevant. Also, Israel is a subject close to the BBC’s keyboards.
In setting itself up as educator, and because it is here dealing with “some of the world’s most important ideas,” the BBC is duty-bound to ensure editorial rigor of its content. Yet, the corporation shirks this duty when it complacently defers it to the author of the “potted history” of Zionism. Using drab and noisy illustrative cartoons that are in some cases inaccurate and inappropriate, with the voice-over veering high and low, further underlines the utter slovenliness of this BBC product.
Clearly, the Zionism -ism was also a “fun one” of the -isms. Theodor Herzl gets tomatoes thrown at him, Jews are swivel-eyed and other such – it adds up to a bit of a list in this 3.08-minute agitated animation.
(Continue to Full Column)
The writer is a specialist in British Mandate Palestine and is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.
Roza I.M. El-Eini..
JPost/Opinion..
05 October '19..
On its website, the BBC has an animated series entitled An A-Z of -isms – including one episode titled “Zionism: A Very Brief History” – and gives this strapline: “Writers, academics and thinkers share their takes on some of the world’s most important ideas (plus a few fun ones).”
The corporation declares that it is “the world’s leading public service broadcaster,” and creates “distinctive, world-class programmes and content which inform, educate and entertain millions of people in the UK and around the world.” Therefore, although, so far, only 79,300 or so of those millions have clicked the Zionism animation, it must be remembered that it is on the BBC’s website and not on some obscure ranter’s internet outlet.
As it is, for now, one of the most viewed -isms, it cannot be ignored and remains relevant. Also, Israel is a subject close to the BBC’s keyboards.
In setting itself up as educator, and because it is here dealing with “some of the world’s most important ideas,” the BBC is duty-bound to ensure editorial rigor of its content. Yet, the corporation shirks this duty when it complacently defers it to the author of the “potted history” of Zionism. Using drab and noisy illustrative cartoons that are in some cases inaccurate and inappropriate, with the voice-over veering high and low, further underlines the utter slovenliness of this BBC product.
Clearly, the Zionism -ism was also a “fun one” of the -isms. Theodor Herzl gets tomatoes thrown at him, Jews are swivel-eyed and other such – it adds up to a bit of a list in this 3.08-minute agitated animation.
(Continue to Full Column)
The writer is a specialist in British Mandate Palestine and is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.
Sunday, October 6, 2019
Two more Gazan Fell Shorts crash into Gaza. Who will be paying the price of Gazan terror this time? - by Arnold Roth
Who was injured in Gaza by the Gazan rocket? What damage was caused? We'll likely never know. Media coverage of Gaza from within Gaza is strictly controlled by Hamas, the Islamist terrorist organization that has ruled it since violently wresting control from Fatah in 2006. Unless the news can inflict harm on Israel, it will never be reported.
Arnold/Frimet Roth..
This Ongoing War..
05 October '19..
Remember our post about Fell Shorts from just a couple of weeks ago?
In "19-Sep-19 Gazan victims of a cognitive war: Who cares?", we wrote about the almost entirely unreported phenomenon of rockets fired from the rocket-infested, Hamas-occupied Gaza Strip in the general direction of Israel but which fall short, crashing onto the heads of homes of hapless Gazans.
It happened again in the early hours of this morning, Saturday.
(Continue to Full Post)
Arnold/Frimet Roth..
This Ongoing War..
05 October '19..
Remember our post about Fell Shorts from just a couple of weeks ago?
In "19-Sep-19 Gazan victims of a cognitive war: Who cares?", we wrote about the almost entirely unreported phenomenon of rockets fired from the rocket-infested, Hamas-occupied Gaza Strip in the general direction of Israel but which fall short, crashing onto the heads of homes of hapless Gazans.
It happened again in the early hours of this morning, Saturday.
(Continue to Full Post)
Friday, October 4, 2019
The True Goal of "Anti-Normalization" With Israel - by Bassam Tawil
They are worried that an Arab who greets a Jew may one day make peace with Israel. They are worried that an Arab state that hosts Israeli athletes may one day make peace with Israel. They are worried that Arabs who go to work in Israel may fall in love with Israelis and stop thinking of ways to kill them or destroy Israel.
Bassam Tawil..
Gatestone Institute..
03 October '19..
Arabs who dare to greet Jews in public on the Jewish New Year are being denounced by their fellow Arabs as traitors. Arabs who dare to engage in sports activities with Jews are also being condemned by their fellow Arabs as traitors.
In the past week, many Arabs have taken to social media to express outrage over a Jewish New Year greeting by Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
On September 29, the minister posted on his Twitter account "Shana Tova" ("Good Year" in Hebrew). His greeting to Jews celebrating the Jewish New Year has triggered a wave of condemnations from many Arabs, including Palestinians, who accused the minister of promoting normalization with Israel.
The vicious ad hominem attacks on the UAE foreign minister included prayers that God allow him to burn in hell and several posters comparing him to a monkey. Because of the greeting, the minister is also being denounced as a "Zionist," "war criminal," "dog," "traitor" and "pig."
Some Arabs expressed hope that the UAE will vanish "just like Israel will cease to exist."
Others seized the opportunity to remind the "shameless" minister of the Qur'an verse (Al-Ma'idah, 51) that says:
The attacks on the UAE foreign minister came as many Arab social media users strongly condemned Qatar for allowing Israeli athletes to participate in the 2019 World Athletics Championship, held at the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha from September 27- October 6.
The presence of the Israeli athletes in Qatar drew sharp criticism from many Arabs, who expressed outrage on social media through a hashtag titled, "Normalization is Treason."
Qatar has been accused by its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies, of sponsoring and funding the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood and extremist groups such as Hamas, the Palestinian terror group ruling the Gaza Strip.
Qatar's alleged support and financing of extremist groups, however, has not spared it criticism from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the second-largest terror group in the Gaza Strip. In recent months, Qatar has been playing a role in preventing all-out war in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Hamas. The Qataris have also been delivering millions of dollars in cash to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as part of an effort to boost the Palestinian economy there and help poor and unemployed Palestinians.
(Continue to Full Post)
Bassam Tawil..
Gatestone Institute..
03 October '19..
Arabs who dare to greet Jews in public on the Jewish New Year are being denounced by their fellow Arabs as traitors. Arabs who dare to engage in sports activities with Jews are also being condemned by their fellow Arabs as traitors.
In the past week, many Arabs have taken to social media to express outrage over a Jewish New Year greeting by Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
On September 29, the minister posted on his Twitter account "Shana Tova" ("Good Year" in Hebrew). His greeting to Jews celebrating the Jewish New Year has triggered a wave of condemnations from many Arabs, including Palestinians, who accused the minister of promoting normalization with Israel.
The vicious ad hominem attacks on the UAE foreign minister included prayers that God allow him to burn in hell and several posters comparing him to a monkey. Because of the greeting, the minister is also being denounced as a "Zionist," "war criminal," "dog," "traitor" and "pig."
Some Arabs expressed hope that the UAE will vanish "just like Israel will cease to exist."
Others seized the opportunity to remind the "shameless" minister of the Qur'an verse (Al-Ma'idah, 51) that says:
"O you who believe, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are allies of one to another (when against you), and whoso from amongst you takes them for allies, is indeed one of them."
The attacks on the UAE foreign minister came as many Arab social media users strongly condemned Qatar for allowing Israeli athletes to participate in the 2019 World Athletics Championship, held at the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha from September 27- October 6.
The presence of the Israeli athletes in Qatar drew sharp criticism from many Arabs, who expressed outrage on social media through a hashtag titled, "Normalization is Treason."
Qatar has been accused by its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies, of sponsoring and funding the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood and extremist groups such as Hamas, the Palestinian terror group ruling the Gaza Strip.
Qatar's alleged support and financing of extremist groups, however, has not spared it criticism from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the second-largest terror group in the Gaza Strip. In recent months, Qatar has been playing a role in preventing all-out war in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Hamas. The Qataris have also been delivering millions of dollars in cash to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as part of an effort to boost the Palestinian economy there and help poor and unemployed Palestinians.
(Continue to Full Post)
Thursday, October 3, 2019
BDS, the new face of the old antisemitism: What will we do to stop it? - by Adam Milstein
BDS is the new face of the old antisemitism, and when it comes to fighting antisemitism, the old adage “better late than never” is particularly apt for our moment. It’s time for us all to get to work.
Adam Milstein..
adammilstein.org..
02 October '19..
The dishonest proponents of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement have long claimed that they simply aim to further human rights. For years, they were able to recruit many progressives including Jews to support and justify their campaigns. Yet, in recent weeks, the true nature of this hate movement has been acknowledged in unprecedented ways.
After more than a decade of deception, new evidence is being presented by a range of governments, international organizations, and media outlets to show that BDS is nothing but a front for anti-Semitic hate groups and terrorists that seek nothing less than the destruction of the State of Israel. It is the new face of the old antisemitism. The world is just waking up to this horrifying truth, which sheds light on what America can do to address this growing hatred around the world.
On September 24, 2019, the United Nations — a body with no love for Israel and a well-documented history of bias against the Jewish State — released an unprecedented report on the worldwide spread of anti-Semitism. The UN acknowledged that anti-Semitism is growing around the world, wearing one of three faces: on the far left, the far right, and among radical Islamists. In the report, the UN recognizes for the first time that “the objectives, activities, and effects of the BDS movement are fundamentally anti-Semitic.”
The next day, the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy released a landmark report “Behind the Mask – the Antisemitic Nature of BDS Exposed that reveals the rampant antisemitism within the BDS movement, including its calls for violence against Jews and the dismantlement of Israel. The report demonstrates how the BDS movement has intensified hatred against Jews around the world and provides 80 examples of antisemitism by key activists in the BDS movement. It documents the true face of BDS: a 15-year-old campaign that promotes demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and, in so doing, has exacerbated antisemitic rhetoric against Jews worldwide.
It followed another bombshell Israeli government report from earlier this year, titled “Terrorists in Suits”, which revealed more than 100 different connections linking Palestinian terrorist groups to BDS organizations.
(Continue to Full Post)
Adam Milstein is an Israeli-American Philanthropreneur. He can be reached at adam@milsteinff.org, on Twitter @AdamMilstein, and on Facebook www.facebook.com/AdamMilsteinCP.
Adam Milstein..
adammilstein.org..
02 October '19..
The dishonest proponents of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement have long claimed that they simply aim to further human rights. For years, they were able to recruit many progressives including Jews to support and justify their campaigns. Yet, in recent weeks, the true nature of this hate movement has been acknowledged in unprecedented ways.
After more than a decade of deception, new evidence is being presented by a range of governments, international organizations, and media outlets to show that BDS is nothing but a front for anti-Semitic hate groups and terrorists that seek nothing less than the destruction of the State of Israel. It is the new face of the old antisemitism. The world is just waking up to this horrifying truth, which sheds light on what America can do to address this growing hatred around the world.
On September 24, 2019, the United Nations — a body with no love for Israel and a well-documented history of bias against the Jewish State — released an unprecedented report on the worldwide spread of anti-Semitism. The UN acknowledged that anti-Semitism is growing around the world, wearing one of three faces: on the far left, the far right, and among radical Islamists. In the report, the UN recognizes for the first time that “the objectives, activities, and effects of the BDS movement are fundamentally anti-Semitic.”
The next day, the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy released a landmark report “Behind the Mask – the Antisemitic Nature of BDS Exposed that reveals the rampant antisemitism within the BDS movement, including its calls for violence against Jews and the dismantlement of Israel. The report demonstrates how the BDS movement has intensified hatred against Jews around the world and provides 80 examples of antisemitism by key activists in the BDS movement. It documents the true face of BDS: a 15-year-old campaign that promotes demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and, in so doing, has exacerbated antisemitic rhetoric against Jews worldwide.
It followed another bombshell Israeli government report from earlier this year, titled “Terrorists in Suits”, which revealed more than 100 different connections linking Palestinian terrorist groups to BDS organizations.
(Continue to Full Post)
Adam Milstein is an Israeli-American Philanthropreneur. He can be reached at adam@milsteinff.org, on Twitter @AdamMilstein, and on Facebook www.facebook.com/AdamMilsteinCP.
Wednesday, October 2, 2019
The Mohammed al-Dura Affair: A Little Boy and a Big Controversy - by Raymond M. Berger
When civilian deaths result from military action it is important to investigate the circumstances, if for no other reason than to help military officials avoid unnecessary civilian casualties in the future. But this motivation does not apply to an unscrupulous enemy that deliberately causes civilian deaths on both sides of the conflict in order to score propaganda points. If little Mohammed was indeed killed, he is yet another victim of the Arab war to kill and expel the Jews from the Middle East.
Raymond M. Berger..
Real Bullet Points/ TOI Blog..
30 September '19..
According to news reports at the time, on September 30, 2000, 12 year old Mohammed al-Dura, from the Bureij refugee camp in the Gaza strip, was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers.
Since that day there has been a maze of contradictory news reports, investigations, forensic analyses and legal proceedings. Various investigators and others have questioned whether Mohammed was shot at all and whether Palestinians staged the incident. To this day no one knows for sure.
The al-Dura incident is now a small part of a long history of Arab-Jewish conflict. Revisiting the incident and its aftermath is not an academic exercise. Rather, it carries lessons about a conflict between two peoples, the wages of armed attacks by those who care little about human life, and the use of propaganda to perpetuate blame and hate.
The Story Takes on a Life of Its Own
What is certain is that Muslims across the world used images of a dead Mohammed al-Dura to incite against Israel.
A photo of little Mohammed crouching behind his father became an iconic image of war, much like the famous photo of the Jewish boy in the Warsaw ghetto, with hands raised over his head, or the Vietnamese girl on fire after being doused with napalm.
Across the Muslim world, the photo of Mohammed was printed in newspapers. Video of the incident was played and re-played on television broadcasts. Arab governments named parks and streets in Mohammed’s honor.
When al-Qaeda murdered the Jewish-American journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002, they broadcast a video of the killing that showed an image of Mohammed al-Dura in the background. After the September 11 attacks against the US, Osama bin Laden mentioned the al-Dura incident in a warning to President George Bush. Arab countries issued postage stamps bearing images of a terrified Mohammed cowering behind his father, as son and father take cover. Commentators argued that these images were behind the 2000 lynching of two Israeli soldiers in Ramallah. After French News Channel 2 broadcast video purporting to show that Israeli soldiers had killed Mohammed, anti-Semitism in France increased.
The Intifada as Background
In order to understand the Mohammed al-Dura incident, it is vital to know that it happened in the context of a Palestinian war against Israel.
The day before the shooting, the Palestinians’ Second Intifada against Israel began.
(Continue to Full Post)
Raymond M. Berger..
Real Bullet Points/ TOI Blog..
30 September '19..
According to news reports at the time, on September 30, 2000, 12 year old Mohammed al-Dura, from the Bureij refugee camp in the Gaza strip, was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers.
Since that day there has been a maze of contradictory news reports, investigations, forensic analyses and legal proceedings. Various investigators and others have questioned whether Mohammed was shot at all and whether Palestinians staged the incident. To this day no one knows for sure.
The al-Dura incident is now a small part of a long history of Arab-Jewish conflict. Revisiting the incident and its aftermath is not an academic exercise. Rather, it carries lessons about a conflict between two peoples, the wages of armed attacks by those who care little about human life, and the use of propaganda to perpetuate blame and hate.
The Story Takes on a Life of Its Own
What is certain is that Muslims across the world used images of a dead Mohammed al-Dura to incite against Israel.
A photo of little Mohammed crouching behind his father became an iconic image of war, much like the famous photo of the Jewish boy in the Warsaw ghetto, with hands raised over his head, or the Vietnamese girl on fire after being doused with napalm.
Across the Muslim world, the photo of Mohammed was printed in newspapers. Video of the incident was played and re-played on television broadcasts. Arab governments named parks and streets in Mohammed’s honor.
When al-Qaeda murdered the Jewish-American journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002, they broadcast a video of the killing that showed an image of Mohammed al-Dura in the background. After the September 11 attacks against the US, Osama bin Laden mentioned the al-Dura incident in a warning to President George Bush. Arab countries issued postage stamps bearing images of a terrified Mohammed cowering behind his father, as son and father take cover. Commentators argued that these images were behind the 2000 lynching of two Israeli soldiers in Ramallah. After French News Channel 2 broadcast video purporting to show that Israeli soldiers had killed Mohammed, anti-Semitism in France increased.
The Intifada as Background
In order to understand the Mohammed al-Dura incident, it is vital to know that it happened in the context of a Palestinian war against Israel.
The day before the shooting, the Palestinians’ Second Intifada against Israel began.
(Continue to Full Post)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)